Tuesday, September 25, 2018


Higher Consciousness and Human Birth
                                                                                              *Saumitra Mohan

            Rebirth of a departed soul is said to transpire in accordance with the level of one’s spiritual evolution. As a scholarly University graduate, with no penchant of studying in lower classes, would not like to go back to the playschool, similarly an evolved human soul generally does not take birth as a subhuman entity. Any other birth would not do justice to his elevated nature. So, a human being does not generally have rebirth in lower beings like insects, plants or animals because his higher consciousness would be incapable of manifestation through lower forms.
            Our highly evolved consciousness, as existing at the time of our death, can only be expressed through a human birth. If our thoughts and desires are very rudimentary and more in the realms of lower order of living beings, we shall reincarnate as an animal or other lower beings. As a mango seed, when planted, would not materialise as anything else but a mango tree, similarly the life germ of a human soul has its defined basic nature leading it to manifest as such, given the availability of ideal conditions required for its growth.
            Every living organism, as we know, derives the basic building blocks for its manifestation from the same elements including earth, water, fire, ether and wind. Different seeds, saplings or living beings derive the same basic inputs from the nature for their growth and sustenance, yet they grow differently in accordance with their immanent nature and consciousness. We come from and return to the same elements of nature, something which often appears magical to many of us. As such, all the living beings are interconnected, deriving sustenance from each other.
            How does a banana tree produces bananas or a rose plant gives rose flowers despite getting the same building materials from the nature. What makes the difference in the seeds or saplings? We can cross the existing seeds or saplings, but are still not capable of creating a new life-form or explaining the basic functioning of a cell or an atom. Why does a unicellular zygote shape up as a multi-cellular human being in a pre-programmed fashion remains a mystery?
            The birth of a Plato, Einstein or a child prodigy presupposes their existence in a germ or a subtle form capable of manifesting under certain conditions. All our powers of seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, touching, thinking, intelligence and reasoning are contained by this invisible germ called ‘soul’ which manifests itself under ideal conditions. Otherwise, there would be no difference between a dead and live body. It is the soul which animates a physical form.
            The theory of genetics can explain the biological phenomenon, but can’t explain the difference of intelligence of the offspring from the same parents under identical conditions. The differences in our individuality are explained as the outcome of the varied spiritual evolutions while our personality is influenced by the material circumstances and genetics.
            Reincarnation as a lower being remains an impossibility unless one’s consciousness gets so degraded and attenuated as to come close to the nature of the lower beings to take birth as such. That is why, many among humans devoid of any human emotions or thinking capacity, are found to be akin to animal nature. Many remain so unconscious that they go through life as an automaton or a zombie who would not think beyond basic survival, just like animals.
            Many of these humans, being at the lowest level of consciousness, are happy to merely survive. They merely indulge in animal pleasures, far removed from the uplifting avocations as distinguishes a human from an animal. After all, how do you expect an individual remaining content throughout his life just eating, defecating and procreating? Most of these people are at the beck and call of others, quite comfortable to be at the receiving end of the social hierarchy. But that is something which creates a balance in the society otherwise it would result into a chaos.
            The Creation does not visualise the existence of many leaders. If all the humans are at the same level of consciousness, societal equilibrium would break down. So those at the lower level of the spiritual pecking order help complete the matrix of the material world by doing the jobs assigned to them in their respective positions in the hierarchy, thereby affording opportunity for the higher souls to indulge in spiritual exercises. As they are not cognitively equipped, they mainly do the physical chores while those up the order are more into the cerebral and thinking roles.
            Many of us suggest that a human body is nothing but a function of its various organs which is not true. Science tells us that motion generates motion, but it does not tell us as to what bodily function creates a thinking mind or various human emotions. Defining a human body merely as an outcome of organic functions is like putting the effect before the cause which is very illogical. Like every other life germ or seed, the human soul manifests itself when right conditions for the same are available. It is the differentiated soul consciousness which provides an individuality to every human being.
            Those who deny the existence of the soul believe that something could come out of nothing which is not true. The Semitic religions including Islam, Judaism and Christianity or Zoroastrianism believe that the soul was created at the time of Creation and granted immortality by the God. But this argument does not hold. After all, anything which has a beginning has to have an end like the human body. Science tells us that everything which exists in the end must have existed in the beginning.
            In Genesis, it is said that God created man out of the dust and blew the breath of life into his nostrils. This itself presupposes the existence of the dust, God and the breath. If God creates the soul, why does He create so many varieties of characters at different levels of mental, physical and emotional capacities? Why does He differentiate among various human beings? Why can’t He make us all the same? If we were to believe this, a wrongdoer or a criminal should not be penalised as it is God who made him as such and he can’t be faulted for the crimes or felonies he commits.
            Unless we answer this question satisfactorily, the Almighty would appear very unjust. It only shows that the souls have the individuality of their own which explains the differences in human beings. If we accept the existence of a soul today, it has got to have existed since the beginning of time. In fact, the creation of the soul itself presupposes its existence as part of the Supreme Soul, something which Vedanta has been telling us for time immemorial. Hinduism believes the ‘soul’ to be part of the Universal Spirit, manifesting itself through countless birth and rebirth as part of an evolutionary process to eventually merge with the latter.
            As a drop off the ocean has the same quality as the ocean itself, similarly the human soul has the same basic nature as the Supreme Soul itself. However, as the drop remains minuscule in comparison to the ocean, we are no match to the Supreme Soul because of its unfathomable nature. But through our selfless action (Niskam Karma), we can slowly evolve to merge with the Supreme Soul to reflect in the His glory. So, if we want to move up the order, we must purify ourselves through uplifting thoughts and actions to realise our true nature.



Our Teacher and Their Teaching
                                                                   *Saumitra Mohan

            Of the many sectors critical to a country’s expedited development, education is definitely the most important one. And it is with this in view that all the countries treat it with the utmost care and importance. Perhaps that’s why, the benefits of education has spread far and wide all across the world. The countries which realized it earlier and invested wisely in their human resources stole a march over their counterparts in other parts of the world who woke up late to appreciate the value of education.
            The Constitution of India, realising the import, very specifically mentions the need for universalizing education among the Indian citizens. Article 45, as part of the Directive Principles of State Policy, says, “The State shall endeavour to provide early childhood care and education for all children until they complete the age of six years”. All the education policies framed by the Government of India since independence have rightly been emphasizing the improvement of infrastructural and pedagogical tools over the years.
            However, there still appears a lot amiss when we see the net output of our education system. And of all the things, it is the teachers and teaching which remain the weakest link in the whole scheme of things. While a teacher is supposed to be most important factor, s/he appears completely out of place when it comes to imparting education. Be it his own motivation to teach, his qualifications, his teaching felicities, his training credentials, his involvement in the school administration or his proactive role in building the holistic character of our future citizens, the teacher remains on the margins.
            A teacher is said to be very high in social hierarchy in USA; only a teacher is allowed to sit down in French courts; teachers could be arrested only after the Govt permission in Japan; a teacher is equivalent to a Minister in status in South Korea; a primary teacher gets the highest salary in USA and many European countries. However, the popular image of an average Govt teacher is not very uplifting in our country. S/he is perceived as an unconcerned, unaccountable, unconscientized money-driven person who is involved with anything and everything but education.
            Hence, if we really wish to improve our education system, we need to pay the requisite attention to all aspects surrounding our teachers. And, the beginning has to be made with the recruitment of teachers, something which is afflicted by needless sleaze, politics and politicking. The teacher recruitment in our country is often so politicised that the same hardly leaves any scope for enlistment of capable and competent teachers who really love to spend time and energy with our tiny tots.
            Ergo, the first step has to be restructuring of our teacher recruitment system which is alleged to be marred by politics and venality. The same should be so designed as to attract the best talents to our schools. The basic qualifications should be duly customised to different segments of school education so as to attract the most well-trained and motivated teachers into our schools. The same should be coupled with a well-planned teacher’s training, something which is often informed by dilettantism.
            There still remain many schools with surplus or scarce teachers. The same need to be immediately revisited to rationalise the deployment of our teachers as far as possible and practicable. There are good number of schools with zero or negligible enrollment. The same should be either closed down or merged with neighbouring schools for optimum utilisation of available human resources. Teacher’s availability in every school should be ensured with a view to ensuring regular and structured instructions in our schools.
            Many empirical studies have pointed to various flaws in our teachers’ training module and delivery thereof. Most of these training sessions are alleged to be conducted with the least of professionalism. The training is not taken seriously either by the trainers or the trainees. The training is usually viewed as an opportunity for a ‘Get-Together’ at Govt expense with no follow up on the training inputs imparted.
            Because of fast changing times and emergent complications in educating impressionable minds, the teachers should be encouraged to keep pursuing and nurturing their knowledge for better appreciation of child psychology. Generally, it is seen that most of the teachers get so engrossed in the day to day mundane demands of life that they stop enriching themselves. That’s why, it is advisable that special incentives and encouragements be provided for motivating them to add more functional qualifications to their education. Hence, there is an urgent need to make the teachers’ training more structured, professional and pedagogically relevant. It is with this view that many state governments have been approaching this subject with a lot of gravitas.
            Even though there exist specific laws against our teachers indulging in private tuitions beyond the school hours, still a good number of our teachers continue to take private tuitions thereby compromising their commitment to classroom teaching. As long as such a practise is allowed to continue, it would be very difficult to improve the quality of instructions of our schools. That’s why, the relevant authorities associated with the management and administration of school education need to start enforcing relevant laws against private tuitions by full time teachers.
            Again, teachers’ participation in regular politics is something which needs to be discouraged and stopped immediately as the same conflicts with the imperatives and objectives of imparting better quality education to our children. It also conflicts with and compromises the commitment and motivation of our teachers towards their immediate tasks i.e. preparing our future citizens. The teacher should be allowed to participate in politics only after their resignation from his/her job in the concerned schools.
             Another obstacle to quality teaching relate to teachers’ preoccupations with various extra-school assignments. Most of the teachers are drafted for different purposes other than teaching which encroaches upon their time for attending to their various tasks in the school including teaching. This includes regular round-the-year engagement in extra-teaching duties like census, survey, elections and various development-related IEC activities which tear them away from their own pressing tasks of teaching. Teachers’ involvement with running Mid Day Meal (MDM) is also alleged to be a diversion to their teaching assignments. The relevant rules should be strictly enforced to discourage our teachers from indulging in private tuitions, something which detracts from the professional honesty to their tasks.
            Besides, it is advisable that teaching and school management should be segregated into two different cadres. Association and involvement with day-to-day management and administration of school also compromise a teacher’s commitment to his tasks. Often, the unwarranted conflicts with the politically-drafted Management Committees interfere with his teaching responsibilities. So, the entire affairs of school management and pedagogy ought to be duly separated without compromising the efficiency of each other.
            All said and done, the system of school inspection must be revitalized and strengthened. Regular and systematic school inspection of our schools, private and public, would guarantee uniformity in terms of instructional quality and basic childcare. The School Inspectorate System needs to be reinforced through more recruitment and provisioning of required logistic and regulatory support along with independence to do their work in keeping with the relevant policies and guidelines made in this regard.
            If we are really serious about our school education, we need to attend to all the above-mentioned issues emergently otherwise our schools can’t cope with the challenges of a bloating population. We shall never be able to reap the demographic dividends with half-baked education of our children who shall be the future citizens and leaders of India and a globalized world.


Tuesday, September 11, 2018


Simultaneous Elections: How Practicable?
                                                                                                *Saumitra Mohan

            With the next Parliamentary elections due in 2019, preparations for the same have already commenced. While the timing of the ensuing elections is subject to the consideration of multiple factors including relevant Constitutional stipulations by the Election Commission of India (ECI), another important electoral issue has lately been engaging the attention of the policy makers and political observers. This relates to the conduct of simultaneous elections (SE) for the Lok Sabha (the House of People) and the various Vidhan Sabhas (provincial Legislative Assemblies). A very intense and keen debate has been raging in the country regarding the advisability of the same for quite some time now.
            Various arguments have been advanced for and against the proposal. Many critics have termed the proposition as a chimera without any practicability. They feel that such a move, if at all realised, would actually compromise the plural character of Indian society by    encouraging and propping a ‘One-Party-Rule’ both at the Centre and in the federating provinces across the country which may not do justice to our multi-splendoured diversity. Having a monolithic Government for the whole country, many apprehend, may make the ruling dispensation somewhat authoritarian and unaccountable to the electorate.  
            After all, having elections at regular intervals across the country keep the politicians and the political parties on their toes while also keeping them on the leash. The extant system ensures more accountability vis a vis the proposed idea of having SE which actually conjures the scenario of a single political party dominating the political scene across the country. However, the champions brush the argument aside by terming it nothing but a wild conjecture.
            SE elections are merely a means to save the precious time and resources of the         country. The move would still give scope for reflection of societal pluralities at the hustings. The proposition also affords a more holistic outlook and freedom to the policymakers which would facilitate more effective policy making. The Government in power shall actually be unencumbered by the imperatives of electoral politics which often compromises its autonomy and encourages prodigal populism for wooing the voters due to the uncertainties stemming from frequent elections.
            It has been suggested that holding SE would save the country plenty of revenue which is usually spent on the conduct of multilevel elections at regular intervals. The money, thus saved, could be well utilized for the purpose of developing our country. As per available records, a total of 3870 crore rupees were spent by the Government of India (GOI) on the conduct of parliament elections in 2014. The same was conducted at 2.3 lakh polling stations across the country with the assistance of 1349 companies of Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) and 1.11 crore polling personnel.
            The massive expenditure, manpower and logistics required for conduct of these staggered elections almost every year for the various Legislative Assemblies and Parliament could be hugely pruned by holding of the SE. As of now, the finances required for the conduct of Parliament and Legislative Assembly elections are provided by GOI and concerned State Governments respectively. The required ballpark expenditure for the conduct of 2019 Parliament elections come to around 4500 crores which could be easily shared among the Central and State Government, thereby saving precious resources, time and energy for attending to more pressing developmental needs.
            Another major suggested advantage of SE relates to the avoidance of major disruption of common public life because of the conduct of frequent elections. The same negatively impacts and cripples the developmental process and policy making because of the prolonged imposition of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC). This also compromises national security because of the regular deployment of the CAPFs away from their core areas. The intense political battles, as fought regularly due to these elections, also keep the political pot boiling. The ensuing internecine parochial politics and politicking based on caste, religion, language and region often compromise the societal consolidation and national integrity. The advocates, however, argue to the contrary saying the move actually consolidates and strengthens national unity because of the emerging ‘national feeling’ and harmony due to broadbased debates and discussion.
            However, the biggest hurdle for undertaking such an exercise shall be the reaching of a consensus by all the stakeholders including the national and regional political parties. As of now, most of the major political parties have opposed the idea on one or the other ground. It is feared that such an exercise shall actually benefit the national political parties while jeopardizing the prospects of the regional parties. The latter visualize a distinct disadvantage in such elections as SE would be usually contested on national issues, thereby marginalizing the local issues and compromising the electoral prospects of smaller parties. Surprisingly, even many national parties are averse to the idea because of their own political calculations.
            Again, SE for all the State Legislative Assemblies and Parliament in 2019 seem impossible as the terms of most of the state assemblies don’t expire around the time Parliament elections are proposed to be held. So, anyhow it shall be partial SE involving Parliament and only few State Legislative Assemblies. As things stand now, many observers feel that, at most, 12 State Legislative Assemblies could be tagged to the forthcoming Parliament elections in 2019. These states, inter alia, include Odisha, Jammu and Kashmir, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Jharkhand, Haryana and Bihar. For many of these states, premature dissolution of State Assemblies shall be required but the same should not be very difficult as they are ruled by the likeminded political formations.
            Notwithstanding all the foregoing discussion, the Election Commission of India has recently ruled out firmly the possibility of holding SE in 2019 because of legal imponderables. It has said that the proposition is an impossibility given the absence of the required legal framework. The changes required for realising the idea include the introduction of relevant changes in the Constitution of India and the Representation of People Act, 1951. The same is a very long drawn process which is impossible to be realised before the scheduled time of the proposed elections to the Parliament.
            Many of the observers have also pointed to the futility of such an exercise, given the complexity and character of Indian polity. Even though we conduct such an SE, the reality would soon revert back to the present situation as it is unlikely to ensure that all the Central and State Governments would survive their full term. Sooner or later, one or the other State Government shall witness a premature dissolution of the State Assemblies due to emergent political complexities, thereby warranting the conduct of separate elections. In a country as large as India, the practicality of such a proposition remains doubtful.
            Besides, many observers also feel that the regular and separate elections are, after all, not such a bad thing as is usually made out. Firstly, the expenses on these elections create purchasing power in the economy thereby generating the multiplier effect by pushing the demand-supply chain. The plural character of our polity warrants such regular elections which ensure more accountability and sensitivity to the electoral needs. This also wards against societal dissonance and discord. One just feels that all the stakeholders shall soon sit together to seal the debate sooner than later in the better interest of our polity.