Bridging the Trust Deficit in EVMs
*Saumitra Mohan
The
Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) are said to have been first used in 1982 for
the North Paravur Assembly by-election in Kerala for a limited number of
polling stations, but were approved for wider use by the Election Commission of
India (ECI) in technical collaboration with Bharat Electronics Limited and
Electronics Corporation of India in 1989. But EVMs made their universal debut
in 1999 Parliamentary Elections after extensive consultation with all the
relevant stakeholders and have since become an indispensable part of our
electoral system in India.
The
doubting Thomases from across different political parties have questioned the
credibility and efficacy of EVMs from time to time. But, the cry against EVMs
seems to have reached a crescendo lately with a section of the political class
demanding their replacement with the erstwhile system of paper ballots. While
there are a huge number of countries including most of the developed countries
which still use paper ballots for exercise of right to franchise or for any
sort of voting, India was one of the few countries which introduced EVMs to get
over the multiple problems associated with the system of voting through paper
ballots.
The
introduction of EVMs saved humongous costs involved in production and printing
of crores of ballot papers, their transportation and storage. It was a very
eco-friendly move by consequent saving of millions of trees for obtaining the
required paper. An estimated 10,000 tonnes of ballot paper is saved every
general election and many times more whenever an Assembly or local body
election is held due to use of EVMs. Voting and counting have both become
faster while the same has also resulted in substantial reduction in the number
of counting personnel and the remuneration paid to them. Indubitably, India’s
general masses have found it easier to exercise their franchise through EVMs
than the ballot paper system.
EVMs
are not only easier to transport and store because of their lighter weight and
portability, but are also are safe from the elements due to being enclosed in
polypropylene carrying cases. The shelf-life of these EVMs is approximately 15
years. The EVM stores the result in its memory before the same is cleared manually.
Its powering system is efficiently designed as the power pack is required only
to activate the EVMs at the time of polling and counting. The same could be
switched off conveniently at the end of polling.
After
the rulings from Delhi High Court, the Supreme Court and the demands from some
political parties, the ECI has recently decided to introduce the voter-verified
paper audit trail or VVPAT for further increasing the confidence of the
stakeholders in the authenticity and effectiveness of EVMs. The system allows a
voter to ensure that the vote cast by her/him could be verified to have been
cast in favour of the desired candidate.
Besides,
there are enough avenues and scope provided to the individual candidates,
political parties and any other stakeholder to verify the accuracy, authenticity
and reliability of an EVM during the three-time commissioning of these machines
preceding the actual polling. Before these commissioning sessions where EVMs
are checked for any defects and prepared for their eventual use at respective
polling stations, multiple rounds of meetings and training sessions are
organised for all the stakeholders for explaining the various nuances of
polling through EVMs where the booth level assistants (BLAs) for political
parties apart from their senior representatives and office bearers remain
present. Conducted under foolproof security, close circuit TV and videography,
the EVM preparation and commissioning are done very meticulously and diligently
to the satisfaction of all the stakeholders in their presence.
The
commissioning schedule and protocol are so designed to ensure that no malfunctioning
EVMs, if at all, are used for the actual polling. Every commissioned EVM goes
through multiple checks and trials to the full satisfaction of the contesting
candidates and authorised representatives of recognised political parties
before being accepted for the actual polling. Every EVM also has to undergo a
Mock Poll of mandatory number of votes and for any number of votes for a
certain percentage of randomly picked EVMs as desired by the stakeholders.
After the commissioning of EVMs, the same are stored in pre-sanitized Strong
Rooms amidst three-tier security cordons where contesting candidates and
authorised representatives from the political parties are given freedom to
watch the Strong Room to ward against any suspected hanky-panky or possible
tampering of these EVMs.
Assuming things could still go wrong
notwithstanding these checks and controls, a further opportunity is afforded to
the contesting candidates or their polling agents present in respective polling
booths. Before the start of actual polling, a further Mock Poll is held under
the supervision of the Presiding Officer (PRO) to assure oneself against any
foul play or tampering of the EVM. A Mock Poll certificate is signed by the PRO
with polling agents of contesting candidates appending their signatures to the
same. Besides, the Election Observers, polling officials and other stakeholders
including polling agents or contesting candidates or their authorised
representatives have full liberty to check the functionality of EVMs from time
to time while the voting is in progress. VVPAT, as introduced recently, only
further enhances the authenticity and credibility of the EVMs.
So,
the system is so designed to ward against any suspected foul play before,
during and after the voting. The contesting candidates or their representatives
are given full freedom to satisfy themselves of the genuineness of the entire
process or the effectiveness of the EVMs before the votes are finally counted
on the day of counting. In the interim, EVMs are duly secured in the Strong
Room before they are against taken out for the counting amidst very tight
security and electronic surveillance. The counting protocol is also very
minutely planned and structured to pre-empt against any negative manoeuvring by
any side. The entire system is intricately designed to ensure a free and fair
poll to the full satisfaction of all the stakeholders.
Against
this background, it is really very unfortunate to hear and know of the putative
loss of confidence of a section of our political class in the efficiency and
effectiveness of the tried and tested EVMs. As someone who has been associated
with the conduct of many parliamentary, Assembly and local body elections and
has seen the effectual functioning of these EVMs at close quarters, this is really
quite disconcerting and perturbing. This is more so because the ECI has
afforded opportunities to all the stakeholders to prove their apprehensions of
any possible tampering of these machines. The political class needs to
understand that the alternative available to the EVMs does not inspire any
confidence at all. If one’s car goes out of order or pollutes, that does not
mean we should go back to the bullock cart. Similarly, alternative to the EVMs
can never be the erstwhile ballot paper system which is very cumbersome, costly
and retrograde as the same brings to the fore the possibility of the familiar
scenes of ballot box snatching or bogus voting, something EVMs have eliminated.
The EVMs could be made further effective
and efficient if the voter identity could be verified biometrically by
importing and grafting the voter’s individual biometric data into the elector’s
photo identity cards (EPICs) to be utilized as a voter-identifying tool to further
reinforce and strengthen the system. One is sure that our democratic polity
shall come out of this trust deficit in EVMs through further dialogue and
discussion, but any contemplation of reversion to the ballot paper system shall
be a backward and retrograde move.